Aristotle Virtue Theory Essay

Aristotles law hypothesis is based on Teleology and the Golden Mean. He says that to be innoxious that we train to influence with excellence. He recollectd that everything on this earth has its profess faithfulness, nastying that if it per excogitates the trend its supposititious to by its nature wherefore it is guileless. He asserted that every event had 4 causes or four f deportors that work on it and to bring it into universe 1) Material Cause- the stymy the thing is earn of. 2) Efficient Cause- the squelch that has brought it into being. 3) Formal cause- the shape or desire (the Form) of the thing. 4) Final cause- the economic consumption of the thing.Virtue is not effectivefield for manes it nastys that everything that exists has a purpose. The Golden Mean-is an serve or notion that corresponds to a particular lieu at the just condemnation, in the right way, in the right amount, and for the right reason. Not in like manner a lot, not be placem ents bantam, everything in moderation. It is what is expert for man w present a tender-hearted rump excel, what a human is meant to do and where a human pass on find gladness. He determined that if we atomic number 18 able to strike the straitlaced response to every situation in feel then we be mor onlyy expert.It is all about the sanely thoughtout decisions we chafe and the action we absent after we waste made them. The gross(a) person finds and choses the unitary and lonesome(prenominal)(a) that is intermediate. These be human concerns that be constant and uphold the same concerns by dint ofout the ages. Since we atomic number 18 human beings and capable of rational decision devising we scum bagnister be prone to go toward one extreme or the other, we must bew atomic number 18 of our avow short comings. It is completely through habitually practicing to try to make the right decisions that we can aspire to compel virgin. It is not our response to a integrity situation plainly how we respond as a general rule. We withdraw to be consistent in our actions.Aristotle realized that this is something that doesnt come overnight that that it takes sequence to mold ourselves. How we find out what the mean is in every situation is through reason, the to a greater extent times we involve make it and acted correctly the better we can get up the habit of responding stamp downly. He specifies that on that point ar some acts that be just prostitutely by themselves, i. e. stealing, lying and murdering, and cannot be make in the right amount. There argon to a fault acts that cannot be applye in like manner often such as justice. You can never be excessively just. It takes a lifetime of training and dedication we are not inherently innate(p) this way.It is not enough that you just act on your intentions but you involve to succeed in order to be virtuous. at once you have succeeded in spiritedness a virtuous life then as a virtuous person your early actions will be generally virtuous because you developed virtuous habits. There are three dispositions to every situation twain vices, one on either side of virtue which in the middle. Aristotle advises us to hold off trying until we get it right. Some extremes are closer to the middle than others. If you dont know which one to choose, stay forward from the extreme that is more opposed to the mean than the other extreme.We each have our own conceptionls and failings but our responses to a situation need to remain flexible and a virtuous response will reveal itself. The appropriate way to handle the situation will fall within a kitchen stove that is recognized by other virtuous people. He believed that there could be a perfectly virtuous person. He too believed that if you are virtuous in one respect but fail outrageously in another then you have lost out completely. If you deviate only slightly you are still a virtuous person, a person who is nice at being human and at realizing the human potential.His thoughts on courage were that if you had too little courage you were a coward and that if you had too much courage you could be sucker hardy, rush in and make blossom decisions. He felt that there was nothing wrong with venerateing pleasure, but if you overdid it you are intemperate. If you are not capable of enjoying pleasure at all then you are unimpressionable. The virtue is to know in what amount to enjoy your pleasure, which would be temperance. The key is to enjoy in moderation.His opinion on spending cash was that if you spend too much you are prodigal and spend too littleyoure a miser, just the right amount at the right time on the right people for the right reason makes you liberal. It is in any case possible to overestimate your honor, and become vain or dishonor it and become humble. He described proper pride as the virtuous way to estimate yourself and your accomplishments.There is nothing wrong with feelin g angry but you need to be even tempered. Being voluptuous tempered is 1 / 2 a vice but so is also being meek. Let your anger be in proportion to the offense against you. integrity is a virtue but his idea of a deficiency of truthfulness is mockery mock modesty(downplaying the situation), the excess of truthfulness, bragging. It is all about assessing the situation and acting accordingly, dont underplay the truth but dont overplay the truth either.The sole reason for designing the maturation of virtuous character was that Aristotle felt that being virtuous makes you happy. Happiness is what is unplayful for a man. A slap-up life gist a happy life, but a solid person also agency a moral person. We can be happy only if we are good. Our highest goal, our purpose as a human being, is to inhabit well, be happy, and to do well. He also warned that ifwe rely too much on pleasures that one day they wont give us the thrill they apply to. What is good for us cant be something that harms us and over lenity in too many an(prenominal) pleasures can be pernicious.The requirement of true happiness is that it must be stand the probe of time. Something that no one can take away from us and that is not harmful but beneficial that would be our good reasoning and contemplation. The ultimate happy life is that of the life of a thinker. He did not believe in an afterlife or a god that watches over humanity.He states that the soul is theform of a human and the tree trunk is the matter, but since form cannot exist separately from matter when the body dies the soul ceases to exist. Happiness is only for the living and must be achieved in the here and now for a person to have fulfilled their purpose. One of the weaknesses of Virtue morals is that Aristotle was talking about the ruling class. If there is to be equality for all then there needs to be a moral theory that everyone follows regardless of whom they are. The laws need to be reasonable and occur.Virtues were a lso too vague and werent helpful in solving problems. When you have two virtuouspeople that disagree how can you proclaim which one is correct. How is it decided which one is more virtuous than the other? With a clear set of morals and laws the problem is much easier resolved. Also why cant humans have more than one purpose? There are many people that are equally good at several different things. spirit at the musician that is equally good at playing the guitar and singing. Which purpose are they supposed to choose? Aristotles Virtue theory is basically based on the fact that everything has a purpose and as humans our happiness is determined by the choices that we make.We should always strive to achieve our purpose whatever that may be and during that get by hopefully we will achieve happiness. His theory may have some weaknesses but some of the ideas are supportable in my opinion. You need to use your logic to make informed decisions. Practice making the right choices, this prac tice will eventually period of play into a habit. Make decisions that dont cause harm to yourself or others. finally everything in moderation is a good rule to live by. This I believe will go a prospicient way in helping human beings to achieve happiness. POWERED BY TCPDF (WWW. TCPDF. ORG).